“creating the foundation for such a child’s utopic dream” “transforming the schedule into a sort of thick weave”
We have all tried to extend our papers with evidence.
Because of this requirement, I was tempted to use a longer sentence or even a full paragraph in a paper. I don’t know about you, but in college, I had a ton of professors who had a word or page limit.
As teachers, we can help our students become critical thinkers who know the facts and the actual research! Specificity is necessary when teaching our kids how to cite textual evidence! People are lazy and/or uninformed, and instead of doing the hard work of researching, we are content to know generalities. The textual evidence might still be relevant and related, yet it might not be specific enough to connect to the student’s response. Specific: Sometimes, the evidence is vague.Students need to practice rereading, skimming, and annotating, so they can locate the best and most relevant textual support. And the toughest part is the time it takes to find the best support.
If there is better evidence, then students need to learn to choose the BEST evidence possible.
Because we need to actually substantiate what we believe, we MUST teach our students how to cite textual evidence before pretty much any other standard!Ĭlick here to JOIN my email list for more reading comprehension ideas and to download “13 Effective Ways To Integrate Test Prep Into Your Classroom!” And really, this skill is key to pretty much any area of comprehension, analysis, and argument. Many, however, don’t understand the need for citing textual evidence. They might know an answer, because they understand the central idea or the main topic. One of the capstones of most reading comprehension standards is to CITE TEXTUAL EVIDENCE! Every answer needs support! Unfortunately, most students struggle with citing evidence.